From: | Dave Smith <dave(at)candata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Fork <mfork(at)toledolink(dot)com>, PostgresSQL mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Trying to build 7.0.3 on SCO 5.0.4 |
Date: | 2000-11-21 18:59:28 |
Message-ID: | 3A1AC610.7050604@candata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Well that is how it ships and other software I have used uses that
notation. It is a moot point though. I changed the pg_hba.conf file as
shown below and get the same error.
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fork <mfork(at)toledolink(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Actually, to have it wide open, i think it should be this
>> #host all 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 trust
>
>
> That *would* be wide open: allow anyone to connect from anywhere.
> I think what Dave actually wants is
>
> local all trust
> host all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 trust
>
> to allow IP connections from localhost only. Depending on how his
> local networking software works, he might also want a host line
> mentioning his real IP address.
>
> This is the second report I've seen this week of someone thinking that
> host = 0.0.0.0 is the right thing to put in pg_hba.conf. Do we have
> some erroneous documentation somewhere that suggests that?
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert D. Nelson | 2000-11-21 19:21:00 | RE: Trying to build 7.0.3 on SCO 5.0.4 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-21 17:59:15 | Re: Trying to build 7.0.3 on SCO 5.0.4 |