Re: Annoying Reply-To

From: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
Date: 2008-10-23 19:07:34
Message-ID: 3A121E4F-3C3A-4CC0-86B6-3AF4D78D7BA4@blighty.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance


On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Collin Kidder wrote:

> Angel Alvarez wrote:
>> Well
>>
>> but the RFC's were in fact prior to thunderbird
>> So for he most of its life, when few people was using it,
>> Thiunderbird was a sad example of your botched attempt of creating a
>> standar of NOT FOLLOWING THE RFC's...
>>
> But, as I mentioned, nobody cares about this particular standard. In
> my opinion a standard which is totally ignored by almost everyone is
> effectively dead and worthless.

If you don't like it (and this applies to everyone else arguing about
it, on either side) please do one of these three things:

1. "Fix" it locally at your end, as is trivial to do with procmail,
amongst other approaches, and quit whining about it.

or

2. Quit whining about it.

or

3. Find somewhere else to whine about it and quit whining about it here.

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rainer Bauer 2008-10-23 20:05:41 Re: Tips on how to efficiently debugging PL/PGSQL
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-10-23 19:04:47 On standards weenies (was: Annoying Reply-To)

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-10-23 20:44:50 Re: Annoying Reply-To
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-10-23 19:04:47 On standards weenies (was: Annoying Reply-To)