Re: [HACKERS] Re: DBD::Pg installation seems to fail with 7.1 libs

From: Frank Jördens <frank(at)joerdens(dot)de>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: DBD::Pg installation seems to fail with 7.1 libs
Date: 2000-11-13 11:27:13
Message-ID: 3A0FD011.4D4B260C@joerdens.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > Thomas, you've been muttering about altering the type resolution rules
> > so that "unknown" will be treated as "text" when all else fails. Are
> > you planning to commit such a thing for 7.1? If not, I'll probably have
> > to hack up parse_coerce.c's select_common_type(), along the lines of
>
> I'm *finally* getting several patches together, to do the following
> things:
>
> o Fix the type resolution for unknown function arguments to fall back to
> "text" or a string type, if available. Previously discussed.

Can this be expected to be found in the 7.1 snapshot release anytime
soon? Otherwise I would have to continue developing my app on 7.0.x,
which is not so good because eventually I will be requiring TOAST and
I'd like to run into 7.1 related trouble - should there be such a thing
;) - as early as possible.

Many Thanks, Frank

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-11-13 14:48:59 Re: AW: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-11-13 08:58:30 AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gabriel Lopez 2000-11-13 12:13:36 Re: wrong documentation and others .....
Previous Message Tom Samplonius 2000-11-13 00:01:14 Re: ODBC /w 7.0.2