FW: Re: Query is running very slow......

From: Dinesh Chandra 12108 <Dinesh(dot)Chandra(at)cyient(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: FW: Re: Query is running very slow......
Date: 2017-05-25 12:26:54
Message-ID: 39b30cfde27a48898340a69940581727@cyient.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi Tomas,

Please find the below input for slow query.

(a) something about the hardware it's running on
RAM-->64 GB, CPU->40core

(b) amounts of data in the tables / databases
Database size :32GB
-----------------
Tables size
-----------------
Workflow.project : 8194 byte
workflow.tool_performance :175 MB
workflow.evidence_to_do :580 MB

(c) EXPLAIN or even better EXPLAIN ANALYZE of the query

"GroupAggregate (cost=16583736169.63..18157894828.18 rows=5920110 width=69)"
" -> Sort (cost=16583736169.63..16714893857.43 rows=52463075120 width=69)"
" Sort Key: tool_performance.project_id, project.project_name, tool_performance.step_id, (date_trunc('day'::text, tool_performance.insert_time)), tool_performance.user_id"
" -> Nested Loop (cost=2.42..787115179.07 rows=52463075120 width=69)"
" -> Seq Scan on evidence_to_do (cost=0.00..119443.95 rows=558296 width=0)"
" Filter: (status_id = ANY ('{15100,15150,15200,15300,15400,15500}'::bigint[]))"
" -> Materialize (cost=2.42..49843.24 rows=93970 width=69)"
" -> Hash Join (cost=2.42..49373.39 rows=93970 width=69)"
" Hash Cond: (tool_performance.project_id = project.project_id)"
" -> Seq Scan on tool_performance (cost=0.00..48078.88 rows=93970 width=39)"
" Filter: ((insert_time > '2017-05-01 00:00:00+05:30'::timestamp with time zone) AND (insert_time < '2017-05-02 00:00:00+05:30'::timestamp with time zone))"
" -> Hash (cost=1.63..1.63 rows=63 width=38)"
" -> Seq Scan on project (cost=0.00..1.63 rows=63 width=38)"

(d) configuration of the database (work_mem, shared_buffers etc.)

work_mem = 32MB
shared_buffers = 16GB
maintenance_work_mem = 8GB
temp_buffers = 64MB
max_connections=2000

Regards,
Dinesh Chandra
|Database administrator (Oracle/PostgreSQL)| Cyient Ltd. Noida.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile: +91-9953975849 | Ext 1078 |dinesh(dot)chandra(at)cyient(dot)com
Plot No. 7, NSEZ, Phase-II ,Noida-Dadri Road, Noida - 201 305,India.

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tomas Vondra
Sent: 24 May, 2017 10:56 PM
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PERFORM] Query is running very slow......

Hi,

On 5/24/17 7:04 PM, Dinesh Chandra 12108 wrote:
> Dear Expert,
>
> While executing the blow query, its taking too long time to fetch output.
>
> Could you please help to fine tune the same?
>

You'll have to provide far more details - the query alone is certainly not enough for anyone to guess why it's slow. Perhaps look at this:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Slow_Query_Questions

In particular, you'll have to tell us

(a) something about the hardware it's running on

(b) amounts of data in the tables / databases

(c) EXPLAIN or even better EXPLAIN ANALYZE of the query

(d) configuration of the database (work_mem, shared_buffers etc.)

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2017-05-25 15:38:13 Re: FW: Re: Query is running very slow......
Previous Message Johann Spies 2017-05-25 12:21:36 Re: Delete, foreign key, index usage