| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) |
| Date: | 2000-10-26 23:45:30 |
| Message-ID: | 39F8C21A.1DBFEF40@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Thursday, October 26, 2000 @ 17:35:49
> Author: tgl
>
> Update of /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/nodes
> from hub.org:/home/projects/pgsql/tmp/cvs-serv71501/src/backend/nodes
>
> Modified Files:
> copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c
>
> ----------------------------- Log Message -----------------------------
>
> Re-implement LIMIT/OFFSET as a plan node type, instead of a hack in
> ExecutorRun. This allows LIMIT to work in a view. Also, LIMIT in a
> cursor declaration will behave in a reasonable fashion,
Does "reasonable" mean that LIMIT is treated as optimizer's
hint but doesn't restrict total FETCH counts ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-26 23:49:52 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-26 21:46:09 | Re: pgsql (configure) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2000-10-26 23:49:38 | Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-26 23:43:33 | Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |