Re: Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2)

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)hub(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2)
Date: 2000-10-11 05:51:59
Message-ID: 39E3FFFF.3CA214B7@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports pgsql-sql

> ... On top of that, I never quite figured out
> the alignment between the egcs and the gcc version numbers (i.e. how does
> egcs 1.1.2 relate to gcc 2.95.2?).

egcs-1.1.2 was internally labeled as 2.91.66.

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-10-11 17:13:30 Re: [ PGSQL for WIN]
Previous Message Ryan Kirkpatrick 2000-10-11 04:41:11 Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2) - solved

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2000-10-11 13:42:05 Can I use subselect as a function parameter?
Previous Message Ryan Kirkpatrick 2000-10-11 04:41:11 Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2) - solved