Re: PostgreSQL encoding question

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Anton Kalauzky <kalauzky(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL encoding question
Date: 2000-10-10 18:35:28
Message-ID: 39E36170.9F96A76C@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general

Anton Kalauzky wrote:
[Problem with sort order in RH 6.1 upgraded to 6.2 versus straight 6.2
install]

> So, do you have any idea about solving this problem? Thank you for your
> time.

This is due to the collation sequence set up in RH 6.2 when you do a
fresh install. The upgrade doesn't touch the file in question,
/etc/sysconfig/i18n. Copy this file as it is from the fresh RH 6.2
install over to the upgraded RH 6.1 install and see what happens.

Red Hat changed, for better or for worse, the collation in RH 6.2 and
later to more closely conform to ISO standards.

Ask on pgsql-hackers, or directly e-mail teg(at)redhat(dot)com for more
details.

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2000-10-10 18:46:43 Re: Re: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL encoding question
Previous Message Gavin M. Roy 2000-10-10 17:22:36 Re: foreign key question: the backend end the connection

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message chris markiewicz 2000-10-10 18:45:54 TEXT vs VARCHAR
Previous Message Adam Ruth 2000-10-10 18:34:18 Re: Some advanced database features, are they present in PostgreSQL