| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, jeff(at)pgsql(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases |
| Date: | 2000-10-09 22:44:35 |
| Message-ID: | 39E24A53.1E07F0EE@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Tom, Bruce,
Thanks. I think that gives me a pretty clear picture. How can we
submit this whole OID thing to the PGSQL FAQ? Want me to write it up?
-Josh Berkus
P.S. BTW, my conclusion based on this discussion is that I will not use
the OIDs for indexing/linking. Instead, I will embrace Michael's
earlier suggestion and have already created universal_sq and started
migrating primary keys to that sequence.
P.P.S. Thank you both for taking the time to hash out this issue.
--
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 436-9166
for law firms, small businesses fax 436-0137
and non-profit organizations. pager 338-4078
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2000-10-09 23:11:04 | RE: foreign key introduces unnecessary locking ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-09 20:14:55 | Re: OID Perfomance - Object-Relational databases |