Re: backup and restore

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: backup and restore
Date: 2000-10-09 19:24:50
Message-ID: 39E21B82.10648F30@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Lamar Owen Wrote:
> > And we thought 7.0 had alot of new features relative to 6.5.....

> I think the true feature-killer release was 6.5.

Well, this is true. I skipped the whole 6.4 series for a reason :-). I
just _knew_ 6.5 was going to be _it_... (in actuality, it's because
RPM's for 6.4 weren't available until 6.5 was nearly ready to
release...).

It was feature-shock to go from 6.3.2 to 6.5.... But the performance
difference was the real kicker, for multiuser concurrent processing.

But that changelog entry for 6.5.3->7.0 was _huge_. And there were
significant changes to many files, not just a few -- the RPMset
differences were substantial from the building/packaging side, the side
I deal with.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-09 19:41:10 Re: Proposal: TRUNCATE TABLE table RESTRICT
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-10-09 19:11:20 Re: Autoconf version discrepancies