| From: | "Mark Hollomon" <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Backend-internal SPI operations |
| Date: | 2000-08-30 14:45:29 |
| Message-ID: | 39AD1E09.85DF6526@americasm01.nt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >> The right way IMHO would be to give views another relkind.
>
> > This appeals to me.
>
> I like it too. Aside from the advantages Jan mentioned, we could also
> refrain from creating an underlying file for a view, which would be
> nice to avoid cluttering the database directory.
Excellent. I think we have a consensus. I'll start coding in that direction.
Anybody have any thoughts on the upgrade ramification of this change?
--
Mark Hollomon
mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com
ESN 451-9008 (302)454-9008
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-08-30 15:05:53 | Re: Backend-internal SPI operations |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-08-30 14:20:43 | Re: Backend-internal SPI operations |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-08-30 15:05:53 | Re: Backend-internal SPI operations |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-08-30 14:20:43 | Re: Backend-internal SPI operations |