Re: Backend-internal SPI operations

From: "Mark Hollomon" <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backend-internal SPI operations
Date: 2000-08-29 16:37:19
Message-ID: 39ABE6BF.153294E7@americasm01.nt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Mark's patch is OK as is, since it's merely relocating some poorly
> written code and not trying to fix it, but someone ought to think
> about fixing the code.
>

I'll take a crack at it.

Just out of curiousity, is there technical reason there isn't
a (say) relisview attribute to pg_class?

--

Mark Hollomon
mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com
ESN 451-9008 (302)454-9008

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-08-29 16:49:05 Re: Backend-internal SPI operations
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-08-29 16:30:20 Re: How hard would a "no global server" version be?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-08-29 16:49:05 Re: Backend-internal SPI operations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-08-29 15:35:15 Backend-internal SPI operations