| From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | elog: clarify usage and style of error reporting functions |
| Date: | 2026-03-17 03:16:13 |
| Message-ID: | 39976911-5A4B-4C52-844B-6FF397CECC8F@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
This came up while reviewing a patch [1], where Tom pointed out the difference between elog() and ereport() and referenced the corresponding documentation [2]. While doing patch reviews, I have also noticed many inconsistencies in the style of detail and hint messages. Even in the current code base, these inconsistencies are quite common. The PostgreSQL documentation [3] already provides guidelines for writing such messages.
For these logging functions, developers are more likely to read the function header comments than the external documentation, so it seems useful to include brief guidelines directly in the code.
This patch adds short style guidelines to the relevant logging functions.
[1] https://postgr.es/m/297458.1772811905@sss.pgh.pa.us
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/error-message-reporting.html
[3] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/error-style-guide.html
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-elog-document-style-guidelines-for-error-message-.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2026-03-17 03:16:38 | Re: Skipping schema changes in publication |
| Previous Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2026-03-17 02:56:13 | RE: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits |