| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Hao Wu <gfphoenix78(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Enables to call Unregister*XactCallback() in Call*XactCallback() |
| Date: | 2022-09-28 15:28:33 |
| Message-ID: | 3996135.1664378913@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 06:05:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah. Whether it's efficient or not, seems like it should *work*.
>> I'm a bit inclined to call this a bug-fix and backpatch it.
> LGTM. I have no opinion on back-patching.
I had second thoughts about back-patching: doing so would encourage
extensions to rely on this working in pre-v16 branches, which they'd
better not since they might be in a not-up-to-date installation.
We could still squeeze this into v15 without creating such a hazard,
but post-rc1 doesn't seem like a good time for inessential tweaks.
Hence, pushed to HEAD only.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2022-09-28 15:44:59 | Warning about using pg_stat_reset() and pg_stat_reset_shared() |
| Previous Message | Melih Mutlu | 2022-09-28 15:19:57 | Re: Summary function for pg_buffercache |