Re: AlterSubscription_refresh "wrconn" wrong variable?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AlterSubscription_refresh "wrconn" wrong variable?
Date: 2021-05-05 02:35:02
Message-ID: 3984603.1620182102@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This patch replaces the global "wrconn" in AlterSubscription_refresh with a local variable of the same name, making it consistent with other functions in subscriptioncmds.c (e.g. DropSubscription).
> The global wrconn is only meant to be used for logical apply/tablesync worker.
> Using the global/incorrect wrconn in AlterSubscription_refresh doesn't normally cause any problems, but harm is still posslble if the apply worker ever manages to do a subscription refresh. e.g. see [1]

Hm. I would actually place the blame for this on whoever thought
it was okay to name a global variable something as generic as
"wrconn". Let's rename that while we're at it, say to something
like "tablesync_wrconn" (feel free to bikeshed).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-05-05 03:47:25 Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-05-05 01:24:27 Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs