| From: | ryan <ryan(at)bel(dot)bc(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: nested transactions |
| Date: | 2000-07-25 21:43:52 |
| Message-ID: | 397E0A18.CD80405B@bel.bc.ca |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Gilles DAROLD wrote:
>
> jprem wrote:
>
> > hello ,
> > postgreqsl 6.5.3 does not support nested transactions.
> > so i don't think it will be suitable for e-com application.isn't it ?
> > does postgreqsl 7.0 support nested transacions ? is postgresql 7.0 a
> > stable version ?
>
> Hi,
>
> I have around 4000 online shop running with PostgreSQL 6.5.3 , Perl DBI,
> Apache/mod_perl
> They are all running well and with transactions....
Another interesting fact for you...
Weblogic which is basically Tuxedo + CORBA from BEA doesn't support
nested transactions either... Since All the transaction stuff comes from
tuxedo, tuxedo doesnt support nested transactions. It can suspend a
transaction, start and commit another transaction and resume the
suspended one, but that'd hardly what I'd call 'nested transactions'.
Regards,
-ryan
--
Ryan Rawson
System Administrator
Binary Environments Ltd.
ryan(at)bel(dot)bc(dot)ca
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-25 22:03:26 | Re: 4 billion record limit? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-25 21:43:24 | Re: can disks be read only? |