| From: | Kyle <kyle(at)actarg(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | JanWieck(at)t-online(dot)de, JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | TCL updates |
| Date: | 2000-07-24 17:00:06 |
| Message-ID: | 397C7616.B616EC10@actarg.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Jan wrote:
> Beginning with Tcl 8.0, dual ported objects got used to deal
> with values. These have (amongst performance issues) alot of
> benefits. Changing all the call interfaces would make it
> impossible to use PL/Tcl with a pre 8.0 Tcl installation.
> Since we're now at Tcl 8.3 (the last I've seen), ISTM it's
> not a bad decision to force the upgrade.
>
> Comments?
Jan, I would support this upgrade. I think TCL runs much faster with
the dual ported calls, right?
I would also like to see proper support for nulls in TCL functions as
this has caused us some problems in the past.
BTW, any news on this: Is there a plan for a way to allow a FK
reference to a table without giving the user select,update privilege on
the referenced table? This is currently causing us some grief in our
design.
Kyle
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| kyle.vcf | text/x-vcard | 185 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernie Huang | 2000-07-24 18:20:33 | Select by priority again |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-24 16:41:34 | Re: Alter table with arrays |