Re: doc: mentioned CREATE+ATTACH PARTITION as an alternative to CREATE TABLE..PARTITION OF

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, David Rowley <drowley(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc: mentioned CREATE+ATTACH PARTITION as an alternative to CREATE TABLE..PARTITION OF
Date: 2023-03-16 20:52:07
Message-ID: 3975824.1678999927@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 04:47:59PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
>> I think all of that feedback is useful, I guess the immediate question
>> becomes if Justin wants to try to proceed with his patch implementing
>> the change, or if adjusting the documentation for the current
>> implementation is the right move for now.

> The docs change is desirable in any case, since it should be
> backpatched, and any patch to change CREATE..PARTITION OF would be for
> v17+ anyway.

Right. Pushed with a little further effort to align it better with
surrounding text.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2023-03-16 21:01:23 Re: How to check for in-progress transactions
Previous Message Tejasvi Kashi 2023-03-16 20:43:31 Re: How to check for in-progress transactions