Re: Decoupling our alignment assumptions about int64 and double

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aditya Kamath <Aditya(dot)Kamath1(at)ibm(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Srirama Kucherlapati <sriram(dot)rk(at)in(dot)ibm(dot)com>, AIX PG user <postgres-ibm-aix(at)wwpdl(dot)vnet(dot)ibm(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Decoupling our alignment assumptions about int64 and double
Date: 2026-02-10 22:23:03
Message-ID: 3974711.1770762183@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> it would be surprising if this stuff doesn't work on this tool chain:

> https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/openxl-c-and-cpp-aix/17.1.4?topic=new-enhanced-llvm-clang-support

Yeah, I'd be interested in trying that toolchain once we have a
finished port on gcc.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-02-10 22:36:16 Re: Remove "struct" markers from varlena, varatt_external and varatt_indirect
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-02-10 22:17:13 Re: Miscellaneous message fixes