Re: add \dpS to psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: add \dpS to psql
Date: 2022-12-08 04:25:32
Message-ID: 39743.1670473532@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I haven't formed an opinion on whether VACUUM FULL should get its own bit,
> but FWIW І just finished writing the first draft of a patch set to add bits
> for CLUSTER, REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW, and REINDEX. I plan to post that
> tomorrow.

The fact that we just doubled the number of available bits doesn't
mean we should immediately strive to use them up. Perhaps it'd
be better to subsume these retail privileges under some generic
"maintenance action" privilege?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2022-12-08 04:43:14 Re: add \dpS to psql
Previous Message Andrey Chudnovsky 2022-12-08 04:25:09 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER