Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1
Date: 2005-05-14 15:47:30
Message-ID: 3974.1116085650@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can't we
> have a signal that does a query cancel, does the normal cancel cleanup,
> then exits rather than asking for another query?

That *is* what we have.

I give up trying to explain myself, since it's obvious that I'm not
getting through to anyone. Commit the darn thing. I take no
responsibility for it and will not investigate any problems.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-14 16:31:22 Re: Best way to scan on-disk bitmaps
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-14 15:32:23 Re: Permissions not removed when group dropped