Re: Slashdot discussion

From: DAROLD Gilles <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slashdot discussion
Date: 2000-07-10 23:21:11
Message-ID: 396A5A67.3178FA1F@darold.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Chris Bitmead wrote:

> Graeme Merrall wrote:
> > Without wanting to starta thread war I think postgres is
> > great, but for many people the learning curve is too great and thus
> > MySQL is a good introduction.
>
> In what way is mysql easier to learn?

To my point of view postgres is more easy to install and to start from.
I have
began to learn SQL and database with postgres95. It's still the most
easiest
database to install and to manage. The only thing it's to read
documentation
and Postgres is now very well documented. I have tried to run mysql
many
time but I never be patient enought to see it run. Beginers knowledge is
perhaps
more advanced than in Postgres mailing list because every one have a
friend
who have run mysql ... Not me :-)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Smith 2000-07-10 23:37:31 Re: Slashdot discussion
Previous Message Graeme Merrall 2000-07-10 23:19:47 Re: Slashdot discussion

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-07-10 23:39:28 Re: pg_backup symlink?
Previous Message Graeme Merrall 2000-07-10 23:19:47 Re: Slashdot discussion