Re: fcntl(SETLK) [was Re: 2nd update on TOAST]

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fcntl(SETLK) [was Re: 2nd update on TOAST]
Date: 2000-07-08 15:08:27
Message-ID: 396743EB.62592694@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> There's a possible DoS attack when someone else comes first and creates a
> file /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432. But detecting whether there's another program
> running on that socket (if it's a socket) isn't going to help because you
> most likely won't be able to delete it anyway. The solution to this is to
> make the path of the socket file configurable more easily so that the
> administrator has the choice of putting it a safer place that he prepared
> appropriately.

If you are worried about DoS, I think the only solution is to figure out
a way to be using one of the reserved <1000 ports. I don't think there's
any way around that is there? Also presumably not using a reserved port
is a security risk. Not that I'm worried.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-07-08 15:44:54 Re: crypt and MD5 - still not wanted
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-08 15:04:00 Re: Re: postgres TODO