| From: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL & the BSD License |
| Date: | 2000-07-07 01:22:03 |
| Message-ID: | 396530BB.8E7922A6@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> Ya, there was a recent change, that can be seen at:
> ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change ... but, if
> you look at the FreeBSD COPYRIGHT in /usr/src, I'm guessing that we've
> never kept up with *any* of the changes to the BSD COPYRIGHT ... we just
> used the one that came with Postgres95 originally and assumed that
> Berkeley never changed it ...
So lets just swap to the freebsd licence and be done with it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-07 01:29:57 | Re: PostgreSQL & the BSD License |
| Previous Message | Matthew N. Dodd | 2000-07-07 01:19:41 | Re: Re: Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul McGarry | 2000-07-07 01:44:15 | MAX() of 0 records. |
| Previous Message | Matthew N. Dodd | 2000-07-07 01:19:41 | Re: Re: Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable? |