| From: | "Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Andrus <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Andrei Kovalevski" <andyk(at)commandprompt(dot)com> | 
| Subject: | Re: Enabling connection pooling by default | 
| Date: | 2008-10-15 16:14:39 | 
| Message-ID: | 396486430810150914g738d71f7t4041b12ff5e3619b@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc | 
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Andrus <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee> wrote:
> Is connection pooling tested and works OK with unicode driver ?
> Can pooling turned on by default in next driver release ?
This is a good question. Until now, I was implementing my own
connection pooling mechanism in my client application.
I have one question for you Andrus.  Are you trying to create a three
tier application that uses ODBC on the second tier to handle
connections for multiple third tier clients?   This would be a good
use for connection pooling.
In my case, I use a two tier approach.  When using only two tiers, I
feel it is better if the client use only one connection that is opened
and maintained throughout the client apps life-span.  In this scenario
to many connections is only going to waste PG server memory resources
but will not give the client any benefits that beyond what a single
connection could due.
-- 
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrus | 2008-10-15 16:58:23 | Re: Enabling connection pooling by default | 
| Previous Message | Andrus | 2008-10-15 15:21:42 | Re: Enabling connection pooling by default |