Re: Alternative new libpq interface.

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, pgsql-oo(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Alternative new libpq interface.
Date: 2000-07-06 09:19:51
Message-ID: 39644F37.EF8B8704@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


--

> My gut feeling about this is that if a complete rewrite is being
> considered, it ought to be done as a new interface library that's
> independent of libpq.

I was thinking more along the lines of massaging the current libpq to
support the new interface/features rather than starting with a blank
slate. As you say libpq is well debugged and there are a lot of fine
details in there I don't want to mess with.

My aims are to get the OO features and streaming behaviour working with
a hopefully stable interface.

Does that affect your gut feeling? Your error observations are
significant and I think they dismiss my 1st suggestion. That leaves the
possibilities of the whole new interface versus massaging the current
interface with streaming/grouping APIs.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-07-06 11:05:09 Re: 2nd update on TOAST
Previous Message Samy Elashmawy 2000-07-06 09:12:23 Re: PostgreSQL & the BSD License