| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-oo(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed new libpq API |
| Date: | 2000-07-05 12:46:54 |
| Message-ID: | 39632E3E.619C6B58@tm.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Okay, first thing off the top of my head ... how does this deal with
> backward compatibility, or have we just blown all old apps out to fhte
> water?
As I see it it is compatible until you _need_ the new features, like
SELECT ** or UNION of selects with different structure.
I have also posted a different/additional proposal that hopefully hides
this from old apps completely.
---------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Galbavy | 2000-07-05 13:00:53 | Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres |
| Previous Message | Jakub Bartosz Bielecki | 2000-07-05 12:43:49 | Re: Re: postgres - development of inet/cidr |