| From: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, pgsql-oo(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed new libpq API |
| Date: | 2000-07-05 07:31:18 |
| Message-ID: | 3962E446.2792DF31@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Follow up: Where it says...
PGresult *res = PQexec("select * from foo");
for (int i = 0; i < PQntuples(res); i++) {
printf("%s\n", PQgetValue(res, i, 0);
PQflush(res) // NEW NEW
}
It should say...
PGresult *res = PQexec("select * from foo");
for (int i = 0; i < PQntuples(res); i++) {
printf("%s\n", PQgetValue(res, i, 0);
PQflush(res, -1) // NEW NEW
}
The -1 argument signifying "flush everything". A specific number
signifying "flush everything below this threshold", where the threshold
is a tuple number.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-07-05 08:05:18 | Re: Proposed new libpq API |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-05 07:20:47 | Proposed new libpq API |