| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Len Morgan <len-morgan(at)crcom(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew McMillan <Andrew(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, "G(dot)L(dot)Lim" <limgl(at)grouplinks(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Conversion from MS Access to Postgresql |
| Date: | 2000-06-27 01:36:56 |
| Message-ID: | 39580538.E8DF22AE@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> ... or what I can do to fix it, I would appreciate it.
A specific problem report to the general list (if you want some feedback
on whether something is reasonable) or a specific problem report to
hackers or bugs (if you have a clearly defined test case) is usually all
that is required to get something fixed.
If you can't distill the problem down to a test case, then it stays an
anecdotal report that we can't do much about. But *really*, we welcome
problem reports; getting and solving these puzzles is (are?) one of the
fun things about developing for Postgres.
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-06-27 01:56:36 | Re: DateTime fields |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-06-27 01:30:49 | Re: Function to convert from (integer) UNIXTIME to DATETIME |