Re: Big 7.1 open items

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-17 00:39:16
Message-ID: 394AC8B4.C5B4CCFB@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


> > So why all the enthusiasm for multi-tables-per-file?

It allows you to use raw partitions which stop the OS double buffering
and wasting half of memory, as well as removing the overhead of indirect
blocks in the file system.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2000-06-17 00:41:30 Re: Mandrake RPMS, was "Building PostgreSQL 7.0.1 documentation"
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-17 00:08:21 Re: Big 7.1 open items

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-17 09:38:29 RE: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-17 00:08:21 Re: Big 7.1 open items