| From: | Paul Caskey <paul(at)nmxs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Bigger sequences (int8) |
| Date: | 2000-06-16 20:01:10 |
| Message-ID: | 394A8786.F0A74BAF@nmxs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Can I make a sequence use an int8 instead of int4?
I have an application where, over a few years, it's quite possible to hit
the ~2 billion limit. (~4 billion if I start the sequence at -2
billion.)
There won't be that many records in the table, but there will be that many
inserts. In other words, there will be many deletes, as well.
If I CYCLE, old record could still be lingering, and I have the overhead
of checking every NEXTVAL to make sure it's not already being used. :-(
Any other ideas? I could use two int4's together as primary key, and do
some crazy math to increment, or jump through other hoops (besides CYCLE)
to intelligently reuse keys ... but then I have some ugly overhead, as
well.
I really want the sequence to just be an int8. Are we talking about a
heinous amount of work in the source code to allow this option? I
wouldn't want to mess with the "CREATE SEQUENCE" syntax; it would seem
more appropriate as a compile-time option.
Paul Caskey
Software Engineer
New Mexico Software
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Giles Lean | 2000-06-16 23:25:22 | Re: postmaster logs |
| Previous Message | Tyler Robert Wood | 2000-06-16 19:57:13 | copying table to a file |