| From: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-15 06:56:12 |
| Message-ID: | 39487E0C.970680AB@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Ross J. Reedstrom" wrote:
> Any strong objections to the mixed relname_oid solution? It gets us
> everything oids does, and still lets Bruce use 'ls -l' to find the big
> tables, putting off writing any admin tools that'll need to be rewritten,
> anyway.
Doesn't relname_oid defeat the purpose of oid file names, which is that
they don't change when the table is renamed? Wasn't it going to be oids
with a tool to create a symlink of relname -> oid ?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adriaan Joubert | 2000-06-15 07:02:29 | Re: New alpha spinlock code passes regression test |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-15 06:43:23 | Re: input/output functions have been changed ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-15 07:11:52 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-06-15 06:29:29 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |