Re: C11 / VS 2019

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C11 / VS 2019
Date: 2025-07-08 20:10:47
Message-ID: 39416edb-0139-48d8-81e4-420fbeaf114e@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-07-08 Tu 3:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> It's done and running. Testing before I re-enabled the animal it shows
>> it was happy.
> In the no-good-deed-goes-unpunished department ... drongo is now spewing
> a boatload of these warnings:
>
> C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Windows Kits\\10\\include\\10.0.18362.0\\um\\winbase.h(9305): warning C5105: macro expansion producing 'defined' has undefined behavior
>
> Looks like this comes out once per .c file -- probably it's
> in an inclusion from <windows.h>. Dunno if there's anything
> we can do but ignore it. I wonder though why we have not seen
> this on other buildfarm animals.
>
>

*sigh*

will investigate.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-07-08 20:11:52 Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but fine-grained for DSM registry ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-07-08 20:01:25 Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()?