Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns
Date: 2020-09-11 15:41:59
Message-ID: 393542.1599838919@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> This works OK for my language at least. I couldn't find any guidance on
> whether there's a problem doing things this way for RTL languages etc,
> but +1 for doing it this way.

Hmm ... fortunately, there's not any large semantic significance to the
order in which the columns are mentioned here. Maybe an RTL speaker
would read the column names in the opposite order than we do, but I
don't think it's a problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2020-09-11 15:42:09 Re: Making index_set_state_flags() transactional
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-11 15:36:08 Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?