| From: | Norbert Meissner <norbert(dot)meissner(at)str(dot)daimler-benz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | Norbert Meissner <norbert(dot)meissner(at)str(dot)daimler-benz(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug or Feature ? |
| Date: | 2000-05-30 09:43:53 |
| Message-ID: | 39338D59.EF061D9C@syssun11f.rrz.debis.str.daimler-benz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Dear Karel,
thank you for answers to my "minor" problems. It seems, that I have to take
some care on designing tables for speed or robustness. I found out that the
int8 type needs also much more time on calculations. I haven't tried it with
numeric, but I think the result is even more worse.
Norbert
Norbert
Karel Zak schrieb:
> >
> > I was thinking about a solution that doesn't cause an overflow. Please
>
> Use 'numeric' datetype. It never overflow and allow you to use deciamal
> numbers, but is slowly and is needs more memory.
>
> Karel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Eugene Karpachov | 2000-05-30 12:40:23 | Re: grant select,update - bug or feature? |
| Previous Message | William Decker | 2000-05-30 03:20:24 | initdb & pg_encoding |