Re: Postgresql usage clip.

From: Ron Chmara <ron(at)Opus1(dot)COM>
To: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>, Erich <hh(at)cyberpass(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql usage clip.
Date: 2000-05-30 03:24:30
Message-ID: 3933346E.E0D31263@opus1.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Brett W. McCoy" wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2000, Ron Chmara wrote:
> > limited
> > in platform support compared to mysql.

And:

> > Well, you have binaries for NT, but what about home users/developers on 95? 98?
> > mySQL even does OS/2. Really.
> But you have to pay money to run it on those platforms (except for OS/2).
> Brett W. McCoy

Yes. How much money has to be paid to run postgreSQL on Win95? Is it
comparable in cost to get support for that platform?

:-)

-Ron

--
Brought to you from iBop the iMac, a MacOS, Win95, Win98, LinuxPPC machine,
which is currently in LinuxPPC land. Your bopping may vary.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Chmara 2000-05-30 03:30:37 Re: Postgresql usage clip.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-30 03:22:07 Re: lots of large objects and toast