Re: Question about databases in alternate locations...

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: "Culberson, Philip" <philip(dot)culberson(at)dat(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Richard J Kuhns <rjk(at)grauel(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about databases in alternate locations...
Date: 2000-05-19 21:03:48
Message-ID: 3925AC34.820CBFF2@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> Having the
> ability to organize tables, indices, etc into tablespaces, and then
> distributing the datafiles in some quasi intelligent fashion is truly pretty
> powerful.

Great feedback! Everyone will agree that there is no problem with the
overall goal. We're just working out the details, and your use-case
with Oracle should and will be one of the use-cases that any
improvements should actually improve :)

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-19 21:16:41 Re: OO Patch
Previous Message Chris 2000-05-19 20:34:06 Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2000-05-19 21:06:47 Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-19 20:50:31 Re: OO / fe-be protocol