| From: | Nikolay Shaplov <n(dot)shaplov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] TAP test example |
| Date: | 2015-11-19 16:26:49 |
| Message-ID: | 3920392.WW462KbYEj@nataraj-amd64 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
В письме от 19 ноября 2015 10:57:27 пользователь Tom Lane написал:
> Nikolay Shaplov <n(dot)shaplov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> > But this is not the issue. We can change it any way we like. The question
> > do we need such example at all, or no?
>
> I'm kind of -1 on the idea of a module that doesn't actually do something
> *useful*.
Actually it tests that sameuser option from pg_hba.conf works as expected.
Allow user to connect only to database with the same name as user name.
I can't say it is something really useful. But my intention was to write an
example, so I choose the most simple functionality to test, so the user of the
example can pay all attention to perl related staff.
I just thought this example might be useful to others. If so, I can prepare it
for commit. Otherwise I will just use it were I intended.
--
Nikolay Shaplov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-11-19 16:30:12 | Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-19 16:23:53 | Re: [PROPOSAL] TAP test example |