Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
Date: 2010-05-12 19:12:14
Message-ID: 3915.1273691534@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mi may 12 14:07:13 -0400 2010:
>> We could try to make this a supported build arrangement, but I'm
>> inclined to think that a cleaner solution is to split out the loadable
>> module as a separate contrib subdirectory. Thoughts?

> Do you mean contrib/pg_upgrade/somelib? If so, +1.

Hmm. I had been thinking the other way, but I'll see if that can be
made to work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-05-12 19:20:35 comment needs to be updated for HS?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-05-12 19:10:47 Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts