Re: Why Not MySQL?

From: Tim Uckun <Malcontent(at)msgto(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why Not MySQL?
Date: 2000-05-02 23:00:45
Message-ID: 390F5E1D.8538744D@msgto.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> exponentially slower... So, sadly I have to go find another backend for this
> application -- a commercial one too so we can get "commercial support"
> (yuck)..

Actually you might want to give Interbase a try. Version 6 is now in
beta and is going to be open sourced. It's been around a while and seems
pretty solid. There will be a commercial entity to buy support
contracts from and the newsgroups are very helpful. As a bonus there is
a realatively large installed user base already and very very nice
client side tools available. See http://www.interbase.com/ or
http://www.interbase2000.com/ for further details.

If I can't get my questions answered about case sensitivity issues here
(no help so far) I will most likely to use it myself.

> I need is basically what PG has.. Transactions are a must as well as some
> sort of sequence -- stability over performance but performance is very
> important too. It also needs to run native on FreeBSD..

IB supports transactions and sequences. It's very stable and pretty
fast. There was a problem with shared memory in the early beta and
earlier releases but it's fixed now. I am pretty sure it runs on FreeBSD
but I am not sure if it runs natively or under linux emulation.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Cook 2000-05-02 23:24:59 Re: postgresql7.0 jdbc driver
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-05-02 22:59:39 Re: Why Not MySQL?