Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date: 2000-05-02 12:59:57
Message-ID: 390ED14D.2BB81FD8@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> > Thinking about it, what's the date on the Makefile? I wasn't sure if the
> > Makefile committed last time (I accidentally overwote the one in
> > src/interfaces).
> Jan put the old one back, and I got your out of CVS and moved it to
> jdbc. It should be the one you committed.

Just guessing: it is reverted to a slightly older version. As I
showed, it has no rule for making jar files, though it *does* make a
jar file automagically :(

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-02 13:14:37 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-02 12:59:36 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-02 13:14:37 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-02 12:59:36 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status