Re: Cosmetic bug in 7.0 docs

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cosmetic bug in 7.0 docs
Date: 2000-05-01 11:22:08
Message-ID: 390D68E0.316741AF@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I today a save time for reading in current docs (it is under next URL?)
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/index.html
> and I found some cosmetic bugs:
> - the copyright is 1996-9, but not 2000 (is it right?)

Fixed that in my sources while generating hardcopy; will commit today.

> - the pg_dump support long argv switches (like the other routines), but
> in docs it is not.

Sorry, where exactly is that in the docs? I haven't looked yet, but
will poke at pg_dump.sgml...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-01 13:02:01 Re: CREATE TABLE AS standard?
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-01 11:08:50 Re: gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target page/SUBSYS.o ?????????????????