Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: Code of Conduct plan

From: gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: Code of Conduct plan
Date: 2018-06-04 17:06:37
Message-ID: 38e7cd6eab4e425de8e47504385faf0d@etecsa.cu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

El 2018-06-04 12:52, Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> On 06/03/2018 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Code_of_Conduct
>>
>> We are now asking for a final round of community comments.
>> Please send any public comments to the pgsql-general list (only).
>> If you wish to make a private comment, you may send it to
>> coc(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)
>
> Thanks for all the efforts on this. It is nice to see us explicitly
> moving toward modernizing our community policies and creating an
> openly inclusive community. There are a couple of notes I have about
> this:
>
> I think we need language that explicitly states that this is about
> participation within postgresql.org only. It is not postgresql.org's
> mission or purpose to police actions outside of their domain. The
> following minor modification would work:
>
> "To that end, we have established this Code of Conduct for community
> interaction and participation within the Postgresql.org project."
>
> There is no language that protects different political or social
> views. In today's climate it is important especially as we are a
> worldwide project. Something simple like the following should be
> enough:
>
> "Examples of personal characteristics include, but are not limited to
> age, race, national origin or ancestry, religion, political
> affiliation, social class, gender, or sexual orientation."

i don't know, because a check "Your agree ours rules", may enough.

Categorize, we will can have different interpretation.
> JD

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2018-06-04 17:24:50 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2018-06-04 17:04:19 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Nolan 2018-06-04 17:10:09 Microsoft buys GitHub, is this a threat to open-source
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2018-06-04 17:04:19 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-06-04 17:24:20 Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2018-06-04 17:04:19 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2018-06-04 17:24:50 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2018-06-04 17:04:19 Re: Code of Conduct plan