Re: No default operator type for indexes for numeric fields???

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Constantin Teodorescu <teo(at)flex(dot)ro>
Cc: PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No default operator type for indexes for numeric fields???
Date: 2000-04-11 14:07:55
Message-ID: 38F331BB.638CA329@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Constantin Teodorescu wrote:
>
> I have the following table structure:
>
> +----------+-----------------------------+-------+
> | Field | Type | Length|
> +----------+-----------------------------+-------+
> | perioada | int2 not null | 2 |
> | gestiune | int2 not null | 2 |
> | produs | int4 not null | 4 |
> | pret | numeric not null | 30.2 |
> | initial | numeric not null default 0 | 25.3 |
> | intrari | numeric not null default 0 | 25.3 |
> | iesiri | numeric not null default 0 | 25.3 |
> +----------+-----------------------------+-------+
>
> Trying to create an index like
>
> create unique index stocuri_pkey on stocuri
> (perioada,gestiune,produs,pret);
>
> I got the following error:
>
> ERROR: Can't find a default operator class for type 1700.
>
> How should I create an index using a numeric field?
>
> Constantin Teodorescu
> FLEX Consulting Braila, ROMANIA

According to the release history, this appears to be something
that has been added for 7.0:

Types
-----
...
Add btree index on NUMERIC(Jan)
...

Mike Mascari

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paolo Sommaruga 2000-04-11 14:23:56 Re: Why fields order is wrong ?
Previous Message Constantin Teodorescu 2000-04-11 13:36:51 No default operator type for indexes for numeric fields???