Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3

From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3
Date: 2000-02-17 02:34:48
Message-ID: 38AB5E48.CD2282E5@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> Doing a Google search for SQL standards, I found a
> wonderful page of links to SQL info, including the BNF
> specs for SQL92 and SQL3. Not exactly gram.y but hopefully
> close.

How official is this? I get the feeling this might
be one guy's interpretation because it seems like
it is missing stuff.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-02-17 02:37:23 RE: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8'
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-17 01:38:38 Re: [HACKERS] Maximum columns for optimum performance (fwd)