| From: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2000-02-03 23:27:37 |
| Message-ID: | 389A0EE9.3BA060D9@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Taral wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Maintaining an accurate count of descendants (or indexes for that
> > matter) would be expensive; in particular, it'd create severe
> > concurrency problems.
>
> What about fixing these things on VACUUM then?
It could produce wrong results to queries if the data is wrong.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-02-03 23:55:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-02-03 23:03:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-02-03 23:55:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-02-03 23:03:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-02-03 23:55:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-02-03 23:03:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |