Re: [PATCH] Add support for leading/trailing bytea trim()ing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for leading/trailing bytea trim()ing
Date: 2021-01-18 20:13:42
Message-ID: 388927.1611000822@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020, at 22:02, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (Maybe the existing ltrim/rtrim descrs are also like this, but if so
>> I'd change them too.)

> They weren't, but I think the description for the bytea functions
> can be improved to have a more precise description
> if we take inspiration from the the text functions.

Yeah, I agree with making the bytea descriptions look like the
text ones. Pushed with minor additional doc fixes.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2021-01-18 20:14:03 Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-01-18 19:44:58 Re: Deleting older versions in unique indexes to avoid page splits