| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Niyas Sait <niyas(dot)sait(at)linaro(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support |
| Date: | 2022-08-31 00:28:58 |
| Message-ID: | 3886822.1661905738@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> Hence, I am wondering if the solution here
> would be to do one xmlXPathNodeSetSort(xpathobj->nodesetval) after
> compiling the path with xmlXPathCompiledEval() in XmlTableGetValue().
Hmm, I see that function declared in <xpathInternals.h>, which
sure doesn't give me a warm feeling that we're supposed to call it
directly. But maybe there's an approved way to get the result.
Or perhaps this test case is wrong, and instead of "node()" we
need to write something that specifies a sorted result?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-08-31 01:50:49 | Re: New strategies for freezing, advancing relfrozenxid early |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-08-31 00:24:17 | Re: effective_multixact_freeze_max_age issue |