Re: Status on 7.0

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status on 7.0
Date: 2000-01-19 15:27:41
Message-ID: 3885D7ED.EDE3D097@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Can I ask how our big open items for 7.0 are doing:
> Unify date/time types(Thomas)

Will do this after getting the outer join syntax going...

> Outer Joins(Thomas)

I've finally gotten back to work on this in the last couple of days.
Remember, at the moment I've only committed to getting *syntax*, but
that we were hoping to push this into the planner/optimizer/executor
soon after.

> I am only asking to know if we should continue with the planned Feb 1
> beta?

I'll be able to do the date/time unification once my parser is back
together and stable (no point in doing it earlier because I'll need a
stable parser to follow up on problem reports). Not sure about making
Feb 1, though I'll guess that the date/time unification is a couple of
days work once I start.

Remember that I'll need two weeks or so to package the docs before
final release, so will need some padding at the end of beta without
too much distraction from other problem reports :(

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-19 15:35:18 Should cast to CHAR or NUMERIC enforce default length limit?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-19 14:55:45 Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql