Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Bernd Helmle" <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation
Date: 2006-11-03 23:24:58
Message-ID: 3878.24.211.165.134.1162596298.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 17:34 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:25:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > Since 8.1 has done this all along and no one's actually complained
>> about
>> > it, I guess no one is using scripts that do "cd". I'm inclined to go
>> > with Bernd's suggestion to change the docs to match the code, but does
>> > anyone have a contrary opinion?
>
>> In Unix you can easily prepend $PWD to the
>> string, but I don't know how easy that is in Windows.
>
> Windows input anyone?
>

Of course you can get the current directory on Windows, if that's what the
question is.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-11-03 23:43:33 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-03 23:09:25 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-11-03 23:43:33 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-03 23:09:25 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation