Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?

From: Ed Loehr <ELOEHR(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
To: Jochen Topf <pgsql-general(at)mail(dot)remote(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?
Date: 1999-12-29 16:23:19
Message-ID: 386A3577.66BCC4B5@austin.rr.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > My question of an earlier posting is still not answered. Does anybody
> here,
> > who reported PostgreSQL to be very stable, use advanced features like
> pl/pgsql
> > procedures, triggers, rules and notifies? Lets have a show of hands. I
> would
> > really like to know, why I am the only one having problems. :-) Although
> > it might be, because, as this is a PostgreSQL mailing list, most of the
> > readers are people who are happy with PostgreSQL, because all the others
> > have left and are on an Oracle list now. :-)

I use triggers, PL/pgSQL procedures/functions, and rules on 6.5.2, and I have
experienced a number of what might be called instability problems for whatever
reason. A review of the posts to the pgsql mailing lists will confirm that you
are not alone in finding some points of instability. But the extent of any
instability is not clear. Watch for a web poll announcement in January to get
a better handle on that data...

Cheers,
Ed Loehr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barnes 1999-12-29 17:04:02 RE: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?
Previous Message Steven Pennie 1999-12-29 15:14:32 unsubscribe